AI for Law firms
Keep the matter moving while you practice law.
Intake, documents, deadlines and billing should support the legal work. Organize the administrative path around each matter, with the firm's lawyers retaining judgment and control.
AI for Law firms
Intake, documents, deadlines and billing should support the legal work. Organize the administrative path around each matter, with the firm's lawyers retaining judgment and control.
These are starting points for a conversation. We scope the workflow around your people, your tools, and the permissions you approve.
AI for Law firms
These are sector-specific systems we can build, with lawyers retaining legal judgment. Delivered capabilities are identified separately in the build library.
75 capabilities and opportunities across 15 areas of the business.
These are opportunities we can scope with your business. They are not presented as previous client projects. Each entry describes a function, not a separate customer or build.
Extract potential clients, counterparties, affiliates, witnesses, and aliases from intake materials.
Run approved searches across authorized firm records and preserve queries and results.
Present supporting records and ambiguity for the conflicts attorney; never issue autonomous clearance.
Limit visibility of unaccepted inquiries and associated confidential information.
Track attorney-requested disclosures, approvals, signatures, and restrictions without deciding whether waiver is permissible.
Record who accepted, declined, or requested more information and what conditions apply.
Populate approved templates for attorney review, including matter-specific warnings only when counsel supplies them.
Create approved folders, matter records, teams, and initial tasks after acceptance.
Suggest filing locations for emails and attachments with confidence thresholds.
Build a navigable index with document identifiers, dates, authors, and access-controlled links.
Answer questions from authorized matter files with document and page references.
Organize reusable templates separately from client-restricted work product.
Enforce matter permissions at search and answer generation, including cached outputs.
Draft research questions from an attorney-defined problem and stated jurisdiction.
Locate candidate authorities through authorized research sources without treating model recall as authority.
Summarize supplied opinions with pinpoint references and stated limitations.
Compare supplied versions, jurisdictions, and effective dates for lawyer review.
Organize potentially contrary authorities for independent attorney examination.
Draft structured analyses grounded in verified materials and identify unresolved questions.
Check authority existence, quotations, pinpoints, relevance, and treatment through authorized sources and human review.
Track selected official sources and route potential changes to responsible attorneys.
Draft sections from attorney-selected allegations, authorities, and forms without inventing facts.
Build source-linked timelines preserving conflicting dates and accounts.
Organize attorney-specified elements against supporting and adverse evidence.
Assemble relevant statements and exhibits without ranking credibility as established fact.
Summarize testimony with transcript page-and-line references and caveats.
Suggest questions from counsel’s objectives and verified record gaps.
Verify approved numbering, cross-references, legibility, and document completeness.
Assemble attorney-selected briefs, exhibits, authorities, and procedural checklists.
Calculate attorney-defined scenarios and assumptions without autonomous negotiation or outcome guarantees.
Track counsel-approved custodians, sources, collection steps, and outstanding requests.
Distribute approved hold notices and track acknowledgments, reminders, and escalations.
Suggest likely responsive documents for validated attorney-supervised review.
Flag possible privileged material for legal determination, never automatic privilege clearance.
Populate draft entries from reviewed documents with source traceability and attorney approval.
Check approved production sets for numbering, missing files, metadata, and redaction failures.
Monitor requests, counsel-approved due dates, objections, deficiencies, and follow-up tasks.
Extract candidate dates and obligations from court notices with page-level provenance.
Connect validated rules-based calendaring tools with jurisdiction, trigger, and rule-version records.
Require designated personnel to confirm critical dates before authoritative calendar entry.
Compare approved docket, matter, and team calendars and flag mismatches.
Track verified court-specific formatting and procedural requirements with review dates.
Check approved documents, attachments, signatures, and filing selections before authorized submission.
Match submission acknowledgments and rejection notices to the matter and responsible staff.
Escalate unacknowledged critical tasks and maintain manual backup procedures.
Track approved authorizations, providers, requests, received records, and outstanding gaps.
Draft treatment timelines tied to record pages, distinguishing documented diagnoses from inference.
Organize billed, paid, adjusted, and outstanding amounts without assuming recoverability.
Assemble counsel-approved narratives, supporting records, and calculations for review.
Extract policy language, stated limits, exclusions, and claim identifiers without deciding coverage.
Track counsel-directed requests and responses without deciding enforceability or payoff amounts.
Organize communications, offers, and requests with documented sources.
Prepare worksheets from verified inputs; counsel and finance approve obligations and every disbursement.
Structure client-supplied family, asset, beneficiary, and fiduciary information for attorney review.
Flag mismatched names, roles, dates, and provisions across counsel-approved drafts.
Organize asset records and valuation evidence without autonomous valuation or legal classification.
Track attorney-approved notices, tasks, filings, and supporting documents.
Categorize supplied financial records and identify missing items against approved checklists.
Compare supplied versions and flag changes for counsel without recommending custody outcomes.
Populate current attorney-approved forms from validated data and flag inconsistencies.
Organize document requests, translations, and counsel-confirmed milestones without autonomous eligibility decisions.
Extract issues from title, survey, lease, and closing materials for specialist review.
Build neutral allegation and evidence matrices with restricted access and no autonomous credibility findings.
Organize supplied financial records and draft schedules for attorney and client validation.
Index evidence and transcript materials while preserving originals, access restrictions, and uncertainties.
Track attorney-verified ownership records, renewal dates, correspondence, and filing status.
Organize records and draft issue lists without autonomous legal conclusions or tax-position selection.
Prepare structured data from approved statements and ledgers for reconciliation review.
Compare bank, control-account, and client-ledger balances under the firm’s validated procedure.
Flag potential negative balances, unexplained transactions, or mismatched matter identifiers.
Prepare attorney-approved requests based on verified balances and engagement terms.
Assemble authority, balances, supporting documents, and reviewer sign-offs without moving money.
Flag missing approvals, receipts, or client-ledger support.
Model cash timing and capital exposure using explicit assumptions, not guaranteed recoveries.
Enforce client instructions and prohibit use where the engagement or policy disallows it.
Scope, suitability, data access and the need for human approval are assessed with you. A capability may be reused across systems.
A practical guide
A matter can be waiting on a missing document, an unanswered intake question, or an internal handoff. Those administrative gaps are a practical place to examine AI assistance.
Read the guideOur approach keeps those decisions with the firm’s authorized legal reviewers. AI may assist with preparation, extraction, and routing, but the firm defines the verification and approval process.
A private deployment can be designed to keep selected model inputs and outputs within an environment managed by ProcessRoot. The firm should also review connected services, access permissions, retention, and support arrangements as part of the complete data flow.
Choose the work to improve and the data you are comfortable using. We help you decide what runs privately, what can use a hosted model, and where a person stays in charge.
Start with your business.
More room to serve your customers. To grow your team.
To work on the business you set out to build.